home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for from:asciilifeform emacs, 92 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Sat Jan 23 02:32:43 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   emacs is a thick enough, barbed enough broomstick, that this is not hard to pull off

Fri Jan 22 03:34:19 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   USE MOTHERFUCKING EMACS

Thu Jan 21 13:38:38 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   the heathens, who lack emacs ?

Mon Jan 11 03:34:08 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   e.g., want x11 emacs ? say hello to dbus

Thu Nov 19 22:10:04 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   which is about on par with emacs lisp in terms of 'it is FOREVER 1972 and not in any good sense'

Thu Oct 29 14:19:28 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   e.g., to walk the blockchain, verify a raid array 24/7 in a loop, handle six parallel compiles; store and play the correct bach fugue depending on what emacs modeline is set; etc.

Sun Oct 25 01:55:40 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   but afaik nobody uses it, most folks run emacs+slime even there.

Sun Sep 20 04:54:54 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   (emacs will tell me where a string occurs, sure, but this is pointedly NOT what i want)

Tue Sep 08 01:52:59 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   emacs in a recognizable form long pre-dated rms.

Tue Sep 08 01:52:41 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   rms, interestingly, did to emacs something much like esr tried to do to the things he sprayed his piss on

Fri Aug 14 02:48:13 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   i suspect that 99% of folks who think they 'hate lisp!111!!111' were created by the harmful delusion that any meaningful work can be done without emacs+slime or the exact equivalent

Fri Aug 14 02:47:18 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=14-08-2015#1237612 << if you think therealbitcoin without rotor is rough, you haven't tried common lisp without emacs+slime...

Fri Jul 03 00:06:36 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   trinque: emacs, you might be surprised to learn, predates rms

Fri Jul 03 00:05:02 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=02-07-2015#1184640 << a bit of a fundamental misconception here. 'emacs' in particular is ~not~ a 'text editor', but a kind of poor man's lisp machine. and is used as such by many folks

Mon Jun 29 01:04:13 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   all looks same on my emacs

Sat Jun 27 21:07:25 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   and i don't have a clock (other than emacs clock) in the room either

Fri May 22 04:50:50 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   wtf was difference b/w 'imac' and 'emacs'

Mon May 11 23:56:12 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   http://real-emacs-users.shithouse.tv << aha.

Fri Apr 03 23:18:03 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   ben_vulpes: i typically compose in emacs but do not use it as a 'client'

Tue Mar 10 13:46:10 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   now all of this probably plays into mircea_popescu's thesis, because it turns out that the main use of graphical bitmaps in a 'symbolics' box or in my emacs is to better shovel text around

« Previous Page    Next Page »